Jul
15

Harry Potter

harry

Best movie of the 6 that are out thus far – Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince doesn’t disappoint. Now I’m one for movies trying to stay as true to the fiction that they come from – and I think that the director of Half Blood Prince does as best as he could to do so. (with the help of his writers of course) There are so many characters in the Harry Potter stories that you can’t expect them all to make the final cut in the films – nor can the director stray away from what makes Harry Potter – Harry Potter. So it’s no surprise that some people might’ve been somewhat disgruntled by this latest film in the franchise, but I thought as far as a movie adaptation goes – it was pretty solid.

Sum It Up:

This movie picks up exactly right after the last film – Harry has just lost his uncle, the Death eaters are running a muck, and He Who Must Not Be Named is causing everyone to be on watchful alert. Harry and Co. are bustled back to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry and there are many things that have changed. Mainly the influence of teenage hormones. Amongst all the fear and loathing that is surrounding the grounds of Hogwarts, the adolescent teens are still finding times to “snog” in the corridors. Meanwhile Harry has been with Dumbledore to divulge in lessons of the past. By using the Pensive and the memories taken from certain individuals Harry is to piece together the puzzle to a big question. All of this leads to the gathering of what are referred to as Horcruxes and the sad ending of the film.

the Good:

My hats off to the special effects team this time around. First comment that came out of my mouth when the credits started to roll was that the CG and Visual Effects were so much better! Things that I complained about in previous Harry Potter movies such as Quidditch, or even CGI monsters etc. all seem but distant memories. This time Quidditch was actually amazing to watch and it looked fantastic. The effects from the wands whether it was a spell being cast, a curse being thrown or the simple illumination of the tip all seemed very real and a treat for the eyes. A lot of this movie is shot within the castle walls, but the few parts that were away from Hogwarts seemed epic in every sense of the word. Whether it was the Burrow or the cliffs in which Harry and Dumbledore find themselves as they search for the Horcrux – it all looked amazing. (compared all of the previous entries)

The acting has also grown better with time. This is obviously due to the cast maturing and growing with the characters that they’ve been playing for years. It can’t be all that hard to play as Hermoine Granger or Ron Weasley after doing it for over 7 years. Even so, it seemed like everyone knew the importance of how this film leads up to the remainder of the story and really tried to give it their best. Along with that – there were a few additional characters that got to stretch their acting talents quite a bit this time around. One in particular, that I was happy to see again (since in The Order of the Phoenix he practically didn’t exist) was Draco Malfoy. The kid who played him can actually act and he did very will in my opinion. I felt his anguish with the task that lay before him and his internal struggle. He delivered every line with a sinister snear and hatred towards Harry that we’ve all grown very accustomed to him having. He is every bit of what I had built up in my mind for that character and I applaud his efforts.

Now as everyone is aware – as with all the previous films – things must change in order for the story to work as a film. You can’t expect the writers and director to fit in every last little detail along with every last character mentioned. Granted while reading books we are able to build up great images of what everything would look like if we were to play it out – but when you go to make a film, it’s an important aspect that you try and stay as true to the text will maintaining the integrity of the movie. With that said, they change one big thing in this film and really only left other parts out in order to push the story along. This for me didn’t detract from my viewing pleasure (aside from the one big change) which made it much more enjoyable to watch. When I don’t have to go “aw man why did they do that?”, or “they completely left that out?! – why?!” … I tend to enjoy myself more. These were things I seemed to have asked myself more so during the previous films than I did with this one. So I compliment the writers and director.

Another thing with this film that I’d like to point out is that it’s almost as long as Transformers 2 and I actually never felt like it was stretched out. Funny how they are both fictional movies, with action, romance, humor, but one seemed to get the timing of events and overall pace better than the other. The Half Blood Prince seemed to get this almost exactly right every step of the way. Whether we were laughing at Ron being a dork, feeling sympathetic for Hermoine, or biting our nails as Harry and Dumbledore were frantically trying to get the next Horcrux – it all seemed to work together in a smooth fashion. Oh, and just to add this in there – I didn’t look at my watch once.

the Bad:

WHY IN THE HECK WOULD YOU PUT THE BURROW SCENE EVEN IN THIS MOVIE?!?!? Ok, so I know I said I was alright with the director/writers having to change things in order to make the story work in a limited time frame etc. for the sake of the film – but this was just stupid. It’s only one scene so that’s why I have to bring it up. We are at the Burrow (mind you this is where the Weasleys live) and the Burrow is attacked by Death Eaters. (aka: the bad guys) Basically what happens is that the Burrow is blown up and people have to scatter to new locations in order to be safe from He Who Must Not Be Named. Well that’s all fine and dandy – but it happens in the last book!!! Why do this? Why put an extra scene into a movie that is already complex enough and doesn’t need it. This scene actually doesn’t show anything to move the plot along except for the Harry and Ginny connection, which could’ve been done in a multitude of other ways. Plussssssssssssssssssssss, you could’ve taken that extra time and footage and put in something else that you ommited from the film. (aka: the beginning of the story involving the new Minister of Magic – duh.)

Ok enough ranting on that – moving on to a point that was made to me after we were outside of the theatre and chatting it up. It’s a great point and I give my father kudos for making it. If you haven’t read the books or seen the other movies then DON’T SEE THIS FILM. And yes, I understand that the director/studio was probably thinking that if you’ve seen the movies or read the books then this would be fine. Yet, this movie does not stand up on it’s own merit. It either needs the audience to be informed via the past movies or by being fans of the books. If you haven’t done either and go into this movie completely blind, you would probably think it’s one of the most stupid and idiotic pieces of film in a long while. Granted I and everyone I went with have read the books and have also seen all the previous movies but if you haven’t then I bid you good luck in keeping up.

To add to that – I also think that there was a lack of explanation for things. Sure they summed up stuff with quick little snippets here and there tossed in like sprinkles on a cupcake. But what if the fat kid ate all my sprinkles and I wasn’t able to get any? What if some innocent movie goer was watching and missed an important clue whether it was in a newspaper clipping or someone spoke it in a line directed towards Harry? Does that viewer not deserve to know what’s going on? It just seemed like they had to smash in so much in order to complete the story telling that they couldn’t be expected to explain everything in the detail it needed to be explained in. Yes, I have examples. For example – Who is Fenrir Greyback and why is he a death eater? How did Harry know how to use the thing he puts in Ron’s mouth to keep him from dying? What REALLY is a Horcux and why is it so important for Dumbledore/Harry to find them? Who the heck was the girl that got attacked by the necklace and where the bloody hell did it come from? These are all questions that I think the common moviegoer might ask while they are watching the movie that could’ve been explained with an extra 5 mins for each and you could’ve saved that time by taking out the BURROW SCENE! (oh yeah, see how I came full circle there – impressive eh?)

Also, and I know that I’ve read this in a few other reviews out there – but honestly, there might have been a bit much of the love stuff pushed upon us. From the get go we understand that all the adolescents have hit their peak interests in the opposite sex. We get that girls are interested in boys and vice versa. Yet it didn’t have to be the forefront of the movie. I would’ve rather had a little less of the “snogging” and a little more of the rest of the story brought to our attention.

I’ll also make a quick comment on the relationship between Harry and Ginny…rather – the lack of one. Sure there are a few really good awkward moments tossed in, but really we never see them make that “commitment” to one another and I was never sold on it to begin with – yet at the very end of the movie we’re told that Ron has given them his blessing and that he’ll be alright with them dating eventually. I mean come on – they had one peck on the lips and now we’re boyfriend girlfriend without really seeing them together afterwards? A bit of a stretch – but I digress.

Final Thought:

Yep even after my review I think it was a good movie. It wasn’t a great movie – nor was it the movie of the summer. (Star Trek is still holding strong there) Though, if you’ve seen the other films or have read the books, I think that you would enjoy this next chapter in the 8 film franchise. Granted there are a few key parts left out, and a really big part added in for no aparent reason other than to piss me off – but I enjoyed my time at the movie and that’s what counts.

Rating: 7.5/10

Share with everyone else:
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
About Lucas Tetrault:

I'm a 28 year old Creative Art Director currently working for Kern Creative Group in Muncie, Indiana. I tend to consider myself a bit of a movie buff, hence why I write movie reviews and such. My intent is to write reviews that are entertaining to read and don't sway a reader to either see or not see the film. Please see the reviews as entertainment and nothing more. Enjoy!

Find all posts by Lucas | My Portfolio Site

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “Harry Potter”

 
  1. Doody Brisket says:

    Is very nice Gypsy, I shall very much like to see this movie. Wawawoowa! I’m going through the book again for the second time right now as you know, so things will definitely be fresh in my mind, which will probably make it worse for me, but whatever, it’s what I do. I have a comment though and I haven’t even seen the movie. From the images provided on IMDB, Prof. Slughorn doesn’t look at all what they describe him to look like in the book (fat and the face resembling a lion). This disappoints me! Ah well! Good review! Way to come full circle! I shall comment again after I see this film!

  2. phoenixwave says:

    Honestly, Slughorn as far as a character goes was delightful and fun to watch. I think he was cast perfectly regardless of his appearance.

    Don’t hinge your opinion of the movie on minor details like this and you will enjoy it a lot more.

  3. BK says:

    Yeah I think that Slughorn was great! Just the faces he would make were hilarious… I think casting is one of the finer points of the entire franchise. Even aside from the main characters, Luna, Snape, Malefoy… Brilliant casting. About the special effects, I didn’t notice them, and if I didn’t notice they were special effects then they had to be good.

  4. booooo81 says:

    I have seen the movie, and I too, had re-read the book before seeing the movie. I do not understand the (director/producer-whoever) when there are scenes that are fairly unimportant, and at the same time, are not just made to match the book. For example, in the book, Tonks finds Harry on the train, but in the movie, it’s Luna…..?????? If it doesn’t matter, then why not stick to the book?

  5. Jessica says:

    I liked the movie as well.. DEF. mad that they didn’t put the muggle minister the new minister of magic meeting to show that the Lord Voldemort has reached enough havoc that a muggle needs to know what is causing all the violence..but oh well.. I agree that it was rushed and tonks should have found harry… but oh well! I enjoyed it as well and am glad the acting has been improving and can’t wait to see the last few movies!!! :)

  6. phoenixwave says:

    In response to booooo81:
    I don’t have a 100% answer for why they changed Tonks to Luna – but my guess is that as far as a movie goes – it would’ve seemed odd to just throw Tonks on the train out of no where to find Harry rather than just having crazy ol’ Luna find him – since she could’ve def. been on the train wandering around aimlessly etc. I’m not saying that they should’ve done it – but for making sense out of the movie I think it worked just fine.

    Speaking of Tonks – I wish they would’ve focused a little more time on her and Lupin being together – but since the last book is in two movies, perhaps they’ll have time to bring that up.

  7. Doody Brisket says:

    Ok, so saw the movie this past Sunday and I will list the main differences from the book off the top of my head in order. When the movie starts out, it shows Harry in a little restaurant flirting with the waitress where as the book has Harry back at the Dursley’s and that is where Dumbledore picks him up. Second, in the book, Fleur is engaged to Bill Weasley and no one likes it, while in the movie, Fleur and Bill are left out all together. Third, on the train after Malfoy stuns Harry, it’s Tonks that finds him, not Luna. Fourth, Herimone never confides in Harry about Ron in th book, she knows Harry likes Ginny by the way he looks at her, but that’s it. Fifth, at Slughorn’s party in the movie, it shows Neville being a waiter, this is not in the book. Sixth, as stated in the review, the disaster at the Weasley’s house in the movie is not in the 6th book at all, my theory as to why to follow. Seventh, the house elves are left out of the movie all together again. In the book, Harry had them tail Malfoy to see what he was up to. Eighth, in the movie, Ginny leads Harry into the Room of Requirement to hide the book and “Snog” him, this is not in the book, Harry does it by himself. Ninth, towards the end of the movie when Snape sees Harry, beneath where Dumbledore is conversing with Malfoy and tells him to be quiet, this is not in the book. In the book, Harry is under invisibility cloak after being stunned by Dumbledore so he couldn’t move or speak and no one knows he’s there. Tenth, the last battle in the book, which I was highly looking forward to in the movie was not there at all. In the book, Harry and Dumbledore upon arriving at the school, hear a battle waiging below them between the Order of the Phoenix, Harry’s friends and the Death Eaters, then the Death Eaters come up to the tower where Harry and Dumbledore are, then Harry chases them out and helps his friends and the Order on his way out. Hagrid fights them for a while outside the castle as well. This battle was left completely out which pissed me off, that could have been very cool. Back to my theory earlier, I think that is why the house part might have been put in, because the last battle was not, so they needed a little more action and put it in there. Eleventh, Dumbledore was buried in a magical white tomb in the book, skipped in the movie. Last, Harry tells Ginny he can’t date her anymore in the book for her safety etc. In the movie, they make it appear that he’s going to continue to date her, which probably means they did that for some change in the next movie. There are other things they did differently, but it still resulted in the same. Like all the hormones being displayed, the relationships didn’t happen in the book as in the movie in the same ways, but it still resulted in the same outcome so that didn’t really bother me. So, I didn’t mention those. All in all, the movie was still entertaining and I still enjoyed it. The acting of the main three is getting a lot better. I personally think Daniel Radcliff is the worst actor of the three. Enough of my rambling, good review! Looking forward to the next!

  8. phoenixwave says:

    Yeah – well as you’ve mentioned they left a lot of things out and changed other things – but to make the movie work – especially with the past movies I see why they did what they did.

    Hardly any movie converted from a book is ever exactly the same. I would say that Watchmen was pretty damn near the same and to me the movie actually lacked because of them staying so true to the book. It just didn’t translate as well on screen as some might have hoped.

 

Leave a Reply