February 8, 2010 at 7:29 pm, by admin | 2 Comments
What exactly does one do when God gets pissed? Do you run and hide and pretend that he can’t find you? Do you stand your ground and curse at the sky above? Do you perhaps look around for the devil and try and strike up a last minute deal? Either way, if you were to indeed be around for the day that God decides that the human existence needs to end, you best get on your knees and pray for a pregnant woman to fall from the sky because if you don’t then you might as well bend over and kiss your sweet ass goodbye. I’d have to say that this movie let me down…sadface.
Legion is a twist on the tale of the apocalypse to come. The day that god will end all and you will be judged. Though, this apocalypse has a slight twist…an angel doesn’t exactly agree with God’s plan and flies down to protect the humans that he has grown to love. It’s this angel that gives us weak and helpless humans a chance to show God that maybe we’re not ready to be destroyed and he can just go ahead and “start over” …
I’m going to get right to the point on the good things of this movie.
I for one think that the original idea behind this movie is what should’ve pulled any audience that it might’ve got, in. I guess I’m a sucker for the angels/demons plot lines, but there was actually more to this than say Heaven and Hell. This story was actually about the characters’ faith in what was going to pull them through this ordeal and above all, God’s faith in humanity.
The main character, the angel Michael, played by Paul Bettany is pretty awesome. This is not the first time we’ve seen Paul play a “religious” role and the part seems to suit him. He tends to be able to transcend the character of “faith” fairly well and it comes across on screen. My one regret is that he could’ve had more screen time, a lengthier back story, possibly a few more lines to help give his character some depth.
And honestly, after those two things I’m finding it hard to push my brain any further to come up with anything else, nope wait. I do have one more – the character design was pretty kewl. For instance, if you look at how they made the wings, and that the angels use them as weapons – that’s pretty awesome. Throw in some attention to detail as far as costumes and a few key items (the attack mace for example) then I’d say that character design somewhat shines through.
Ok, an that’s it for the Good.
I don’t want to talk about everything that was bad with this movie, but I need to warn people if not for their own right to know.
You can’t just throw us into the apocalypse and not explain anything…? The movie drops Michael out of the sky, he cuts his wings off, blows up a building and then goes to help these people. Then we find the people, alone and stranded out in the middle of nowhere’sville and the savior of humanity happens to be there. Of all places! We’re given a laundry list of characters that we feel nothing for because all the while we don’t exactly know why everything is happening. (don’t get me wrong, we’re given some vague idea but it doesn’t make me care any more …)
We’re also given way too many character development scenes for each one of the people that are stranded at the ” Paradise Falls” pitstop. Oh, and that’s another thing – “Paradise Falls”??? Come on, really? I think that there was a movie this past year that enchanted audiences everywhere with it’s little old man trying to get his little old house to “Paradise Falls” with a bunch of damn balloons … and then you go and tarnish that thought with this crappy po-dunk diner pit stop thing? Pssh … for shame. Ok sorry, back to the point. So anyways, at the “Paradise Falls” (hack) … we are seriously given about 5 to 10 minutes for each character to spill their guts about their life and meaningless stories that we could obviously care less about. I understand what the director was trying to do here but they were so random and so pushed that we end up either not caring at all, or we fall asleep (as I did during the girl’s monologue about how her “life sucks blah blah blah” …)
So here’s the sequence: Scene one, Michael falls from sky. Scene two, Michale cuts wings off blows up building and kills cops/angels (though they look like demons-remember this I’m coming back to it) Scene three, “Paradise Falls” and girl/guy have a talk in the morning. Scene four, guy/father talk. Scene five, people at “Paradise Falls” talk in diner – people upset and restless. Scene six, kill granny angel (yes angel – wait for it I’m getting there). Scene seven, Michael gets to “Paradise Falls”. Scene eight, Michael says “get ready” and gives everyone a gun. And so on and so on, the point to any of what I just described is that the pacing was so screwed up from the word “go” that you can never buckle yourself in and enjoy the ride. That’s kind of the point with a action/fantasy/thriller/horror movie. It’s supposed to show us something we’ve not seen and keep us glued to our seats. This movie didn’t. Between all the character monologues and the few and far between action scenes you find yourself more bored than anything. I personally found myself yearning for Michael to strap his wings back on just so I could at least have something to look at.
Oh and let me touch on the angel/demon thing. So why is it that when an angel possess someone, they end up looking like really scary demons rather than just people? It really threw off the audience and myself through out the entire movie. Because now instead of making the audience by into the plot and story, you are confusing us and pulling us from the experience. Now instead of watching and knowing what’s going on, I’m thinking of why the person that was a nice old lady now has sharp pointy shark teeth and dark dead zombie like eyes.
Need I go on?
I could’ve gone on with some more things that upset me about this movie but I digress. Don’t be fooled by the trailer like I was … I really went in expecting this to be a fun movie to watch. I didn’t go in expecting a Oscar nominee or anything, but it had Paul Bettany and a good premise backing it up. This just goes to show that a good concept and a lead man to back it aren’t going to always pull it off in the end. You might rent this movie someday, but save yourself the 8 or 9 bucks.
November 18, 2009 at 8:52 am, by admin | 7 Comments
“Why can’t they just pull the plane up?!?!” A very good question posed by my friend BK (Brandon Kloer) and such a good question that I asked him to go ahead and write the review for the film 2012. The film debuted this past weekend in the year 2009 for fear that the year 2012 might come into play later on and you would not be able to see said film. Honestly if this whole debacle actually happens in the year 2012 then I’ll eat my shorts. Anyways, just trying to keep things interesting. I apologize for the lack of reviews as of late – I’ve just not had time. So without further ado, here is Brandon Kloer’s review of 2012 – thanks BK!
The movie 2012 is the story of the end of the world in the year 2012 as predicted by the Mayan calendar. Our main character Jackson Curtis, played by John Cusack, is a divorced father of two children and a little known author. His entire purpose in this film is to save his estranged family from the inevitable destruction of the planet before it is too late, all the while trying to regain the love and trust of his family. There are more themes to the plot including what makes us civilized and how people lose their humanity in desperate situations which help to round out the story.
Needless to say about this film but the first thing that really stands out even just watching the trailer is the special effects throughout the movie. All the disaster effects look amazing and are so well done that I found them to be believable. Not once during the film did I feel like I was pulled out of the story by a bad special effect. My favorite special effect in this movie was the super volcano. The eruption of the volcano and the subsequent fallout looked impressive and wasn’t quite like anything I’ve seen in a film before.
Another strong feature of this movie was the acting. I’d have to agree with Lucas that it’s hard to go wrong with John Cusack. He delivered where it mattered and had some pretty strong scenes while still being able to present some comic relief. Amanda Peet also did a decent job of portraying Jackson Curtis’ wife in the film and the actors who played their children were decent. However, I feel my favorite performance in the film was delivered by Woody Harrelson (sorry to shortchange Cusack Lucas). His character was so out there that his performance just stuck with me after the film was over. I just wish that he had been in the movie more because he was pretty entertaining.
I was also a fan of the overall plot of the movie. I’m always a sucker for a good disaster/apocalypse movie because there are so many interesting things that directors and writers can do. They came up with a pretty interesting way for the world to end and set the canvas for the amazing scenes that occurred. I found myself really curious how anyone was supposed to survive the end of the world right up to the end of the film.
I’d like to say that the biggest con of this movie was the first half an hour or so but that’d be unfair for me to say because I slept through that part. The movie just started way too slowly. I came into the theatre excited and prepared to see amazing destruction and awesome special effects but I felt I was waiting too long for anything very interesting to get started. I understand that they want to get the characters established and some back story to the film before everything turns to chaos but I just found myself uninterested in the first half hour of the movie. I felt I began to care about the characters more as they banded together and grew closer to survive the apocalypse.
One of my other complaints was that a lot of the really cool action scenes felt reused to me. There are literally three scenes in this movie where the main characters are taking off in an airplane at the last second where almost the exact same thing happens. I just wish that at least one takeoff had gone differently because it seemed like I kept re-watching the same scene over and over. And while I’m on this topic, and I know I’ve said this before Lucas so you knew it was coming, why during the first takeoff was that dumbass flying underground forever?! If you’ve seen the trailer you know what I’m talking about, but during the movie I just wanted to yell at that asshole to pull up.
My only other real complaint about this film is that while some of the acting was really good some of it left me feeling less than impressed. Danny Glover as the president for instance was just terrible but the last film I saw him in that I enjoyed was Lethal Weapon but Mel Gibson wasn’t here to back his ass up this time. Also I found almost all of the Russian characters to be over the top. At times I enjoyed the character Yuri and found him interesting but at other times his strange performance pulled me out of the film.
All in all I feel that 2012 was a good movie. It’s one of those movies that you go to see knowing that you’re going to have to suspend your disbelief but that you’re going to be entertained. And I was very entertained by this movie and you can’t ask for much more than that. Could I have waited until it came out on DVD to see this movie? Probably, but I enjoyed my movie experience.
July 15, 2009 at 11:10 pm, by admin | 8 Comments
Best movie of the 6 that are out thus far – Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince doesn’t disappoint. Now I’m one for movies trying to stay as true to the fiction that they come from – and I think that the director of Half Blood Prince does as best as he could to do so. (with the help of his writers of course) There are so many characters in the Harry Potter stories that you can’t expect them all to make the final cut in the films – nor can the director stray away from what makes Harry Potter – Harry Potter. So it’s no surprise that some people might’ve been somewhat disgruntled by this latest film in the franchise, but I thought as far as a movie adaptation goes – it was pretty solid.
This movie picks up exactly right after the last film – Harry has just lost his uncle, the Death eaters are running a muck, and He Who Must Not Be Named is causing everyone to be on watchful alert. Harry and Co. are bustled back to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry and there are many things that have changed. Mainly the influence of teenage hormones. Amongst all the fear and loathing that is surrounding the grounds of Hogwarts, the adolescent teens are still finding times to “snog” in the corridors. Meanwhile Harry has been with Dumbledore to divulge in lessons of the past. By using the Pensive and the memories taken from certain individuals Harry is to piece together the puzzle to a big question. All of this leads to the gathering of what are referred to as Horcruxes and the sad ending of the film.
My hats off to the special effects team this time around. First comment that came out of my mouth when the credits started to roll was that the CG and Visual Effects were so much better! Things that I complained about in previous Harry Potter movies such as Quidditch, or even CGI monsters etc. all seem but distant memories. This time Quidditch was actually amazing to watch and it looked fantastic. The effects from the wands whether it was a spell being cast, a curse being thrown or the simple illumination of the tip all seemed very real and a treat for the eyes. A lot of this movie is shot within the castle walls, but the few parts that were away from Hogwarts seemed epic in every sense of the word. Whether it was the Burrow or the cliffs in which Harry and Dumbledore find themselves as they search for the Horcrux – it all looked amazing. (compared all of the previous entries)
The acting has also grown better with time. This is obviously due to the cast maturing and growing with the characters that they’ve been playing for years. It can’t be all that hard to play as Hermoine Granger or Ron Weasley after doing it for over 7 years. Even so, it seemed like everyone knew the importance of how this film leads up to the remainder of the story and really tried to give it their best. Along with that – there were a few additional characters that got to stretch their acting talents quite a bit this time around. One in particular, that I was happy to see again (since in The Order of the Phoenix he practically didn’t exist) was Draco Malfoy. The kid who played him can actually act and he did very will in my opinion. I felt his anguish with the task that lay before him and his internal struggle. He delivered every line with a sinister snear and hatred towards Harry that we’ve all grown very accustomed to him having. He is every bit of what I had built up in my mind for that character and I applaud his efforts.
Now as everyone is aware – as with all the previous films – things must change in order for the story to work as a film. You can’t expect the writers and director to fit in every last little detail along with every last character mentioned. Granted while reading books we are able to build up great images of what everything would look like if we were to play it out – but when you go to make a film, it’s an important aspect that you try and stay as true to the text will maintaining the integrity of the movie. With that said, they change one big thing in this film and really only left other parts out in order to push the story along. This for me didn’t detract from my viewing pleasure (aside from the one big change) which made it much more enjoyable to watch. When I don’t have to go “aw man why did they do that?”, or “they completely left that out?! – why?!” … I tend to enjoy myself more. These were things I seemed to have asked myself more so during the previous films than I did with this one. So I compliment the writers and director.
Another thing with this film that I’d like to point out is that it’s almost as long as Transformers 2 and I actually never felt like it was stretched out. Funny how they are both fictional movies, with action, romance, humor, but one seemed to get the timing of events and overall pace better than the other. The Half Blood Prince seemed to get this almost exactly right every step of the way. Whether we were laughing at Ron being a dork, feeling sympathetic for Hermoine, or biting our nails as Harry and Dumbledore were frantically trying to get the next Horcrux – it all seemed to work together in a smooth fashion. Oh, and just to add this in there – I didn’t look at my watch once.
WHY IN THE HECK WOULD YOU PUT THE BURROW SCENE EVEN IN THIS MOVIE?!?!? Ok, so I know I said I was alright with the director/writers having to change things in order to make the story work in a limited time frame etc. for the sake of the film – but this was just stupid. It’s only one scene so that’s why I have to bring it up. We are at the Burrow (mind you this is where the Weasleys live) and the Burrow is attacked by Death Eaters. (aka: the bad guys) Basically what happens is that the Burrow is blown up and people have to scatter to new locations in order to be safe from He Who Must Not Be Named. Well that’s all fine and dandy – but it happens in the last book!!! Why do this? Why put an extra scene into a movie that is already complex enough and doesn’t need it. This scene actually doesn’t show anything to move the plot along except for the Harry and Ginny connection, which could’ve been done in a multitude of other ways. Plussssssssssssssssssssss, you could’ve taken that extra time and footage and put in something else that you ommited from the film. (aka: the beginning of the story involving the new Minister of Magic – duh.)
Ok enough ranting on that – moving on to a point that was made to me after we were outside of the theatre and chatting it up. It’s a great point and I give my father kudos for making it. If you haven’t read the books or seen the other movies then DON’T SEE THIS FILM. And yes, I understand that the director/studio was probably thinking that if you’ve seen the movies or read the books then this would be fine. Yet, this movie does not stand up on it’s own merit. It either needs the audience to be informed via the past movies or by being fans of the books. If you haven’t done either and go into this movie completely blind, you would probably think it’s one of the most stupid and idiotic pieces of film in a long while. Granted I and everyone I went with have read the books and have also seen all the previous movies but if you haven’t then I bid you good luck in keeping up.
To add to that – I also think that there was a lack of explanation for things. Sure they summed up stuff with quick little snippets here and there tossed in like sprinkles on a cupcake. But what if the fat kid ate all my sprinkles and I wasn’t able to get any? What if some innocent movie goer was watching and missed an important clue whether it was in a newspaper clipping or someone spoke it in a line directed towards Harry? Does that viewer not deserve to know what’s going on? It just seemed like they had to smash in so much in order to complete the story telling that they couldn’t be expected to explain everything in the detail it needed to be explained in. Yes, I have examples. For example – Who is Fenrir Greyback and why is he a death eater? How did Harry know how to use the thing he puts in Ron’s mouth to keep him from dying? What REALLY is a Horcux and why is it so important for Dumbledore/Harry to find them? Who the heck was the girl that got attacked by the necklace and where the bloody hell did it come from? These are all questions that I think the common moviegoer might ask while they are watching the movie that could’ve been explained with an extra 5 mins for each and you could’ve saved that time by taking out the BURROW SCENE! (oh yeah, see how I came full circle there – impressive eh?)
Also, and I know that I’ve read this in a few other reviews out there – but honestly, there might have been a bit much of the love stuff pushed upon us. From the get go we understand that all the adolescents have hit their peak interests in the opposite sex. We get that girls are interested in boys and vice versa. Yet it didn’t have to be the forefront of the movie. I would’ve rather had a little less of the “snogging” and a little more of the rest of the story brought to our attention.
I’ll also make a quick comment on the relationship between Harry and Ginny…rather – the lack of one. Sure there are a few really good awkward moments tossed in, but really we never see them make that “commitment” to one another and I was never sold on it to begin with – yet at the very end of the movie we’re told that Ron has given them his blessing and that he’ll be alright with them dating eventually. I mean come on – they had one peck on the lips and now we’re boyfriend girlfriend without really seeing them together afterwards? A bit of a stretch – but I digress.
Yep even after my review I think it was a good movie. It wasn’t a great movie – nor was it the movie of the summer. (Star Trek is still holding strong there) Though, if you’ve seen the other films or have read the books, I think that you would enjoy this next chapter in the 8 film franchise. Granted there are a few key parts left out, and a really big part added in for no aparent reason other than to piss me off – but I enjoyed my time at the movie and that’s what counts.